Compare commits

..
2 changed files with 23 additions and 41 deletions
-20
View File
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
# exp/10 sp5d-moment-features
Variant C: generic-only 19 + 16 new moment/volatility families (skew, kurt,
DSV+ratios, max_up/down, rv_ac1, rv_cv_22, sig lag-5). 35 sp_* fields, ou/hmm excluded.
Run a3f7d1d40c3d4b839314fcf5b40f9b08 (tac-rd-moments / exp 12) — FINISHED.
## Result: NEGATIVE (regression vs generic-only baseline)
| Metric | generic-only 19 (run 7b1e797) | +moments 35 (run a3f7d1d) |
|---|---|---|
| Rank IC | 0.0635 | 0.0466 |
| Rank ICIR | 0.276 | 0.183 |
| L-S Sharpe | 2.55 | 1.44 |
| net excess (cost) | +3.1% IR 0.28 | -16.2% IR -1.57 |
| MDD | -7.3% | -11.1% |
Same failure mode as ou/hmm in exp 9: adding cross-sectional moment features
to the 50-name panel degrades the rank signal. Generic-only 19 remains the
best configuration. No further moment-family variants planned.
@@ -1,22 +1,24 @@
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# VARIANT C (generic + moments): keeps the winning generic-only 19-field set # ISOLATION: multi-seed RankIC ensemble, ablate-B generic-only feature set.
# (jump,har,trend,hurst,signature) and adds the NEW generic moment families the #
# engine now exposes: # Isolates the ensemble effect on the SP-5d rank signal. Same panel, segments,
# - realized skewness / kurtosis (sp_rskew_5, sp_rskew_22, sp_rkurt_5, sp_rkurt_22) # history (full backfilled 2016+) and feature set as the exp-9 ablate-B winner
# - downside semi-variance + ratios (sp_dsv_1/5/22, sp_dsv_ratio_1/5/22) # (generic-only sp_* families: jump,har,trend,hurst,signature), but replaces the
# - signed max moves (sp_max_up, sp_max_down) # single RankICLGBModel with a 5-seed RankICEnsembleLGBModel (42,7,2026,99,123)
# - RV autocorr / vol-of-vol (sp_rv_ac1, sp_rv_cv_22) # that averages per-day predictions.
# - longer-lag signature terms (sp_sig_level2_*_5) #
# Drops the model-specific ou/hmm families (they scored high in importance but # Differs from exp-15 (tac-rd-rank-ensemble, mlflow exp 15) ONLY by dropping the
# hurt the rank dimension in the all-24 run). Same panel/model as baseline. # TA subset (rsi_14,roc_10,macd_hist,willr_14,atr_14) and the inter-asset xr_*
# features, so any change vs exp-15 is attributable to the feature set alone,
# and any change vs exp-9 is attributable to the ensemble + full history alone.
# #
# Run: # Run:
# rd_run_workflow config_path=experiments/workflows/ablate_generic_moments.yaml \ # rd_run_workflow config_path=experiments/workflows/exp12_isolation_ensemble.yaml \
# experiment_name=tac-rd-moments # experiment_name=tac-rd-rank-ensemble-isolated
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
{%- set LAKE = TAC_LAKE_DIR %} {%- set LAKE = TAC_LAKE_DIR %}
{%- set UNIVERSE = "SPY,QQQ,DIA,IWM,MDY,VTI,VOO,VEA,VWO,VT,EFA,EEM,TLT,IEF,SHY,AGG,BND,LQD,HYG,JNK,EMB,GLD,SLV,USO,UNG,DBA,DBC,XLK,XLF,XLE,XLV,XLI,XLY,XLP,XLU,XLB,XLRE,ARKK,SMH,SOXX,IBB,XBI,ITA,XAR,ICLN,TAN,FDN,IGV,ESPO,REM" %} {%- set UNIVERSE = "SPY,QQQ,DIA,IWM,MDY,VTI,VOO,VEA,VWO,VT,EFA,EEM,TLT,IEF,SHY,AGG,BND,LQD,HYG,JNK,EMB,GLD,SLV,USO,UNG,DBA,DBC,XLK,XLF,XLE,XLV,XLI,XLY,XLP,XLU,XLB,XLRE,ARKK,SMH,SOXX,IBB,XBI,ITA,XAR,ICLN,TAN,FDN,IGV,ESPO,REM" %}
{%- set SP_FIELDS = "sp_ret,sp_jump_ratio,sp_jump_flag,sp_jump_tail,sp_max_move,sp_max_up,sp_max_down,sp_rv1,sp_rv5,sp_rv22,sp_vol_ratio_5_22,sp_vol_ratio_1_22,sp_rv_ac1,sp_rv_cv_22,sp_trend_slope_5,sp_trend_slope_20,sp_trend_slope_60,sp_logp,sp_hurst_exponent,sp_sig_level1_lead,sp_sig_level1_lag,sp_sig_level2_lead_lag,sp_sig_level2_lag_lead,sp_sig_level2_lead_lag_5,sp_sig_level2_lag_lead_5,sp_rskew_5,sp_rskew_22,sp_rkurt_5,sp_rkurt_22,sp_dsv_1,sp_dsv_5,sp_dsv_22,sp_dsv_ratio_1,sp_dsv_ratio_5,sp_dsv_ratio_22" %} {%- set SP_FIELDS = "sp_ret,sp_jump_ratio,sp_jump_flag,sp_jump_tail,sp_max_move,sp_rv1,sp_rv5,sp_rv22,sp_vol_ratio_5_22,sp_vol_ratio_1_22,sp_trend_slope_5,sp_trend_slope_20,sp_trend_slope_60,sp_logp,sp_hurst_exponent,sp_sig_level1_lead,sp_sig_level1_lag,sp_sig_level2_lead_lag,sp_sig_level2_lag_lead" %}
qlib_init: qlib_init:
provider_uri: "{{ LAKE }}" provider_uri: "{{ LAKE }}"
@@ -45,13 +47,13 @@ qlib_init:
class: MLflowExpManager class: MLflowExpManager
module_path: qlib.workflow.expm module_path: qlib.workflow.expm
kwargs: kwargs:
uri: "sqlite:///{{ LAKE }}/mlruns.db" uri: "sqlite:///mlruns.db"
default_exp_name: "tac-rd-moments" default_exp_name: "tac-rd-rank-ensemble-isolated"
task: task:
model: model:
class: RankICLGBModel class: RankICEnsembleLGBModel
module_path: tac_qlib.contrib.model.rank_gbdt module_path: tac_qlib.contrib.model.rank_ensemble
kwargs: kwargs:
loss: mse loss: mse
learning_rate: 0.02 learning_rate: 0.02
@@ -66,7 +68,7 @@ task:
subsample_freq: 1 subsample_freq: 1
reg_alpha: 0.1 reg_alpha: 0.1
reg_lambda: 1.0 reg_lambda: 1.0
seed: 42 seeds: "42,7,2026,99,123"
dataset: dataset:
class: DatasetH class: DatasetH
@@ -78,8 +80,8 @@ task:
kwargs: kwargs:
instruments: "{{ UNIVERSE }}" instruments: "{{ UNIVERSE }}"
start_time: 2015-01-03 start_time: 2015-01-03
end_time: 2026-08-10 end_time: 2026-08-14
fit_start_time: 2015-01-03 fit_start_time: 2016-01-04
fit_end_time: 2025-09-01 fit_end_time: 2025-09-01
freq: day freq: day
lake_root: "{{ LAKE }}" lake_root: "{{ LAKE }}"
@@ -98,7 +100,7 @@ task:
- class: Fillna - class: Fillna
kwargs: {} kwargs: {}
segments: segments:
train: [2015-01-03, 2025-09-01] train: [2016-01-04, 2025-09-01]
valid: [2025-09-03, 2026-01-03] valid: [2025-09-03, 2026-01-03]
test: [2026-01-04, 2026-08-10] test: [2026-01-04, 2026-08-10]